TLDR: I not only welcome suggestions, I encourage them. And now, enjoy this discussion of Sunset Boulevard. -Miles
Hey, that's the name of the movie! |
Sunset Boulevard epitomizes Film Noir. Even more so than films like The Maltese Falcon or Double Indemnity, Sunset Boulevard has the feel of timelessness. Watching it now, it still feels innovative, new, and exciting, at once showcasing the qualities and techniques of the era and advancing them further into unknown and groundbreaking territory. Director Billy Wilder is masterful, balancing several plates in the air at once. Let's go back to that definition: "marked by a mood of pessimism, fatalism, and menace." All three are present in Sunset Boulevard, but its forte is definitely "menace." From its camera work to its pacing to its fantastic Oscar-winning score, everything is designed to keep its audience on the edge of their seats, even in the more lighthearted moments of comedy and romance. This menace is present from the very first scene, where a voiceover narration tells us about a man who we see floating in a swimming pool, dead. If that opening image wasn't striking enough, we then find out that our narrator IS in fact our drowned victim, and the film is a flashback told from his perspective. The story being, of course, how he ends up where he is. If you know a better way to lay the groundwork for suspense then I'd like to hear it. As the film goes on that opening image of our narrator (a Hollywood screenwriter named Joe, played by William Holden) is always fresh in our minds, and the underlying threat of his inevitable death is an impossible menace to shake.
He dead. |
It's a great performance, but not exactly a subtle one. |
Pictured: Miley Cyrus. |
You may notice that all of the tabloid names I've mentioned are women. Specifically young, attractive women who are painted as sex symbols at an incredibly young age. And this sexism is not lost on Sunset Boulevard (which hey, remember, that's what this post is about!) Norma Desmond was a young Hollywood star who was cast aside after silent films go out of fashion. Norma is not only not working, but she is no longer beloved as she once was. As Joe tells her, "There's nothing tragic about being 50, not unless you try to be 25." But she denies her aging, and pushes herself on Joe with an air of desperation. She wants to feel young again, she wants to feel important again, and she wants to feel attractive again. Swanson is brilliant here. She captures Norma's pleading sadness with tragic aplomb. As a villain, nothing she does is out of malice, it is all out of the basic need to regain her former glory. She manipulates Joe, cunningly, and brilliantly, offering him gifts and money and lodging and everything he dreams of. "I always wanted a pool," he dryly says in narration. All so that he'll stay and shower her with adoration. But her manipulation comes out of self-imposed delusion. Because of this, it is never clear just how aware she is. Does she know Joe does not love her, and only stays for the money? Possibly. Probably, even. But does she care? This time, the answer is "probably not." The character is hard to feel bad for--she has the wealth, after all, to be able to put up a pretty convincing facade for herself, and she literally murders the one person who gets in her way of maintaining that facade. But Swanson finds Norma's crucial humanity. She is pitiful. You do feel sorry for her. It becomes clear immediately that she will be responsible for Joe's eventual death, so I don't think I'm really giving anything away by saying that at the end of the film, she is led away by the police. This final scene is at once heartbreaking and creepy. As she is led away, she becomes convinced that the reporters are there because she's in a film again. The police, in her eyes, are simply her fans. This is not real, this is just part of another film, and she's in the starring role. Even those who haven't seen the film knows her famous line "Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my close-up," but I don't think everyone realizes that she speaks the line as she is being carted off to jail. She's just happy to be in front of the camera again.
It's fucking heartbreaking.
What's brilliant about Swanson's performance is the respectability she gives the character. She's pathetic in so many way, but we understand why she was once a star. There is a grandness to her as well as a menace. Remember, this entire film is narrated by Joe, who is now dead because of her. And yet, he does not consider her with anger, he considers her with sympathy and awe. And Wilder does the same with his direction.
Joe reacting coolly to Norma's advances. |
Joe is, of course, not the only one feeding into her delusion. While Norma Desmond is the breakout character of the picture, I was also fascinated by the character of Max von Mayerling, her butler, played by Erich von Stroheim. At first seen as simply a doting butler, once his background was revealed, it was a genuinely shocking moment (and, if you haven't seen the film, you might want to skip ahead to the next paragraph and avoid the spoiler). Max is not just a butler, but a former film director, one who directed Norma constantly. Joe is aghast that an artist of such prestige is now performing the duties of a servant, but Max has another surprise: not only did he used to be a director, he is Norma's ex-husband, and he continues to dote on her out of his love for her both as a person, and as a star. He does not want to see her get hurt, and tries his best to shield her from the reality of her own obscurity. He even writes her letters from imaginary friends. Max is an interesting one--I'm tempted to think that his actions are destructive and only contribute to Norma's own fragile state of denial. But, look what happens when Joe confronts her with the truth? She kills him and seems to revert into an even worse state. Max knows Norma better than anyone else. He knows that feeding her delusion is the best way to help her cope (and, as I already mentioned, she has the means to keep such a delusion going). He's a fascinating character: one part servant, one part lover, one part artist, one part fan.
Erich von Stroheim as the butler, Max |
Max is, by the way, played by Erich von Stroheim who was himself a silent film star and who later had a successful directing career. And Gloria Swanson was herself a silent film star (which is what she was best known for until this film launched a bit of a comeback for her and became her most recognizable role). The casting choices throughout the film are pretty brilliant, and especially at the time of its release, would have been identifiable. At one point, Norma and Joe watch one of Norma's old films and the clip that they watch is actually from a film that Gloria Swanson was in, and which Erich von Stroheim directed. These little in-jokes were very intentional on Wilder's part, and he strives to make the film sound as realistic as possible. Although Norma Desmond is a fictional character, everything else about the film is real. The other films and other actors mentioned were all stars at the time, and plenty of silent film stars (most notably Buster Keaton) cameo as themselves. But the most impressive cameo is the director Cecil B. DeMille as himself, who actually plays a fairly prominent role. In talking about her glory days, Norma always bring up DeMille, and a turning point in the film is when DeMille meets with her. Once again, the casting here is pretty powerful. DeMille is authentic and believable because he IS this great director, not just an actor playing one. And, more than that, he had worked with Gloria Swanson and is credited with bringing Swanson to stardom. In the film, he refers to Norma by the affectionate pet name "young fella," which he reportedly used to call Swanson herself. The casting actually reminded me a lot of the recent Best Picture winner Birdman in how it used its casting choices so effectively to manipulate our impressions of the film.
Cecil B. DeMille fawns over Norma |
But all of these observations could simply come down to being fun facts. Whether you know of DeMille's works or of Gloria Swanson's reputation, the film still works. And why? Because it's entertaining. It's a well-told story through the writing, directing, and acting (it's one of the few films to be nominated for an Oscar in all four acting categories). Looking through the catalog of old films, it's remarkable how many don't hold up despite critical acclaim at the time. But it's also remarkable how many still work today. Despite the difference in time and the difference in society, a good story just works. And that's what Sunset Boulevard is.
As the credits rolled on Sunset Boulevard I found myself thinking about the title. Sunset Boulevard is, of course, an actual street in Los Angeles, and it's where Norma Desmond lives in the film. But on the surface it seems like an odd choice for a title. After all, Norma could have lived on any street in L.A., so why was this one chosen as not only her home, but as the film's title. It made me think of what a sunset is really. When we watch a sunset, we are watching a giant star as it fades from our view. As the sun sets, some of its brilliant light lingers, and then eventually it is gone. In a short time, another identical star will rise. The day, like stardom, is fleeting. It is admired, and then forgotten. Norma Desmond is a sun who is setting. The film is her desperately giving off her last bursts of light, hoping to get one last "ooh and aah" from the spectators. It is a tragic story. But, like a sunset, it is a beautiful one to watch unfold on the screen.
Norma, ready for her close up at last, being taken away. |
No comments:
Post a Comment